[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210602111620.GD10272@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:16:20 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] perf auxtrace: Drop legacy __sync functions
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:47:42PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -451,11 +445,7 @@ static inline u64 auxtrace_mmap__read_snapshot_head(struct auxtrace_mmap *mm)
> > static inline u64 auxtrace_mmap__read_head(struct auxtrace_mmap *mm)
> > {
> > struct perf_event_mmap_page *pc = mm->userpg;
> > -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || !defined(HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_SUPPORT)
>
> The test and setup for HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_SUPPORT is not needed anymore either.
Yes, I think there have two files should be cleaned:
Makefile.config
util/auxtrace.c
If still miss anything, please let me know (I remembered there have a
test case for __sync_xxx_compare_and_swap, but I cannot find it now,
so this is why I am concern if I miss anything not).
Thanks for review,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists