linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched/uclamp: Avoid setting cpu.uclamp.min bigger than cpu.uclamp.max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210602123803.15738-1-xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed,  2 Jun 2021 20:38:03 +0800
From:   Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
To:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhang.lyra@...il.com, xuewyan@...mail.com
Subject: [PATCH] sched/uclamp: Avoid setting cpu.uclamp.min bigger than cpu.uclamp.max

From: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>

When setting cpu.uclamp.min/max in cgroup, there is no validating
like uclamp_validate() in __sched_setscheduler(). It may cause the
cpu.uclamp.min is bigger than cpu.uclamp.max.

Although there is protection in cpu_util_update_eff():
“eff[UCLAMP_MIN] = min(eff[UCLAMP_MIN], eff[UCLAMP_MAX])”, it's better
not to let it happen.

Judging the uclamp value before setting uclamp_min/max, avoid
the cpu.uclamp.min is bigger than cpu.uclamp.max.

Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5226cc26a095..520a2da40dc9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8867,6 +8867,30 @@ static ssize_t cpu_uclamp_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	tg = css_tg(of_css(of));
+
+	switch (clamp_id) {
+	case UCLAMP_MIN: {
+		unsigned int uc_req_max = tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value;
+
+		if (req.util > uc_req_max) {
+			nbytes = -EINVAL;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+		break;
+	}
+	case UCLAMP_MAX: {
+		unsigned int uc_req_min = tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value;
+
+		if (req.util < uc_req_min) {
+			nbytes = -EINVAL;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+		break;
+	}
+	default:
+		nbytes = -EINVAL;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	if (tg->uclamp_req[clamp_id].value != req.util)
 		uclamp_se_set(&tg->uclamp_req[clamp_id], req.util, false);
 
@@ -8878,7 +8902,7 @@ static ssize_t cpu_uclamp_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
 
 	/* Update effective clamps to track the most restrictive value */
 	cpu_util_update_eff(of_css(of));
-
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&uclamp_mutex);
 
-- 
2.25.1