linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Remove BUG() to aviod machine dead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:54:09 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Remove BUG() to aviod machine dead

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:14:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 在 2021/6/2 下午1:59, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 02:19:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > 在 2021/5/19 下午10:18, Xianting Tian 写道:
> > > > thanks, I submit the patch as commented by Andrew
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/5/18/256
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, if xmit_skb() returns error, below code will give a warning
> > > > with error code.
> > > > 
> > > >      /* Try to transmit */
> > > >      err = xmit_skb(sq, skb);
> > > > 
> > > >      /* This should not happen! */
> > > >      if (unlikely(err)) {
> > > >          dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
> > > >          if (net_ratelimit())
> > > >              dev_warn(&dev->dev,
> > > >                   "Unexpected TXQ (%d) queue failure: %d\n",
> > > >                   qnum, err);
> > > >          dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> > > >          dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > > >          return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > > >      }
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 在 2021/5/18 下午5:54, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
> > > > > typo in subject
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:46:56PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > > > > > When met error, we output a print to avoid a BUG().
> > > 
> > > So you don't explain why you need to remove BUG(). I think it deserve a
> > > BUG().
> > BUG() will crash the machine and virtio_net is not kernel core
> > functionality that must stop the machine to prevent anything truly
> > harmful and basic.
> 
> 
> Note that the BUG() here is not for virtio-net itself. It tells us that a
> bug was found by virtio-net.
> 
> That is, the one that produces the skb has a bug, usually it's the network
> core.
> 
> There could also be the issue of the packet from untrusted source (userspace
> like TAP or packet socket) but they should be validated there.

So it is even worse than I thought. You are saying that in theory untrusted
remote host can crash system. IMHO, It is definitely not the place to put BUG().

I remind you that in-kernel API is build on the promise that data passed
between and calls are safe and already checked. You don't need to set a
protection from the net/core.

Thanks

> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> > 
> > I would argue that code in drivers/* shouldn't call BUG() macros at all.
> > 
> > If it is impossible, don't check for that or add WARN_ON() and recover,
> > but don't crash whole system.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
>