[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210602133040.398289363@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:12:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] sched,perf,kvm: Fix preemption condition
When ran from the sched-out path (preempt_notifier or perf_event),
p->state is irrelevant to determine preemption. You can get preempted
with !task_is_running() just fine.
The right indicator for preemption is if the task is still on the
runqueue in the sched-out path.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 7 +++----
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8568,13 +8568,12 @@ static void perf_event_switch(struct tas
},
};
- if (!sched_in && task->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+ if (!sched_in && current->on_rq) {
switch_event.event_id.header.misc |=
PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT_PREEMPT;
+ }
- perf_iterate_sb(perf_event_switch_output,
- &switch_event,
- NULL);
+ perf_iterate_sb(perf_event_switch_output, &switch_event, NULL);
}
/*
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -4869,7 +4869,7 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
- if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
+ if (current->on_rq) {
WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->preempted, true);
WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->ready, true);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists