linux-kernel - Re: docs: Convert the Speakup guide to rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2044b3a6-45e1-5fe9-cabb-88a2758cde24@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:38:01 -0300
From:   Igor Torrente <igormtorrente@...il.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
        speakup@...ux-speakup.org, corbet@....net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, grandmaster@...klimov.de,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: docs: Convert the Speakup guide to rst

Hi Jani,

On 6/2/21 9:27 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2021, Igor Torrente <igormtorrente@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> On 6/1/21 6:55 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Igor Torrente, le mar. 01 juin 2021 12:39:01 -0300, a ecrit:
>>>> I was reading all the emails sent in this thread, but I'm not sure how I
>>>> should proceed. Do think should I continue to improve the patch with the
>>>> Jani Nikula suggestions? Or abandon it? Or keep both versions?
>>>
>>> It seems that people are fine with the switch to the .rst format, and
>>> it'll indeed allow much better distribution of its content, so please
>>> continue improving the patch with the suggestions from Jani, you have an
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
>>>
>>> and the review will probably come from Jani, who seems to actually know
>>> a bit about the rst syntax :)
>>
>> OK, I will keep improving it.
> 
> Heh, I just made suggestions on things that I thought could be done
> better, but please see for yourself how it renders and how it actually
> works with Braille displays. That should have priority over anything I
> suggest.

I understand and agree. But I don't have a braille display to test the 
change, so I will need the help of the community anyway.

And if anything gets worse I can revert the changes in the next patch 
version based on the feedback.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 

Thanks,
---
Igor M. A. Torrente