[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <896642516.5866.1622642818225.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, bristot <bristot@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
acme <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"Joel Fernandes, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
kgdb-bugreport <kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: Change task_struct::state
----- On Jun 2, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> Change the type and name of task_struct::state. Drop the volatile and
> shrink it to an 'unsigned int'. Rename it in order to find all uses
> such that we can use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE as appropriate.
>
[...]
>
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
[...]
> @@ -1559,7 +1560,8 @@ static int fill_psinfo(struct elf_prpsin
> psinfo->pr_pgrp = task_pgrp_vnr(p);
> psinfo->pr_sid = task_session_vnr(p);
>
> - i = p->state ? ffz(~p->state) + 1 : 0;
> + state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
> + i = state ? ffz(~state) + 1 : 0;
> psinfo->pr_state = i;
> psinfo->pr_sname = (i > 5) ? '.' : "RSDTZW"[i];
> psinfo->pr_zomb = psinfo->pr_sname == 'Z';
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -113,13 +113,13 @@ struct task_group;
> __TASK_TRACED | EXIT_DEAD | EXIT_ZOMBIE | \
> TASK_PARKED)
>
> -#define task_is_running(task) (READ_ONCE((task)->state) == TASK_RUNNING)
> +#define task_is_running(task) (READ_ONCE((task)->__state) == TASK_RUNNING)
>
> -#define task_is_traced(task) ((task->state & __TASK_TRACED) != 0)
> +#define task_is_traced(task) ((READ_ONCE(task->__state) & __TASK_TRACED) != 0)
>
> -#define task_is_stopped(task) ((task->state & __TASK_STOPPED) != 0)
> +#define task_is_stopped(task) ((READ_ONCE(task->__state) & __TASK_STOPPED) !=
> 0)
>
> -#define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task) ((task->state & (__TASK_STOPPED |
> __TASK_TRACED)) != 0)
> +#define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task) ((READ_ONCE(task->__state) &
> (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) != 0)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
>
> @@ -134,14 +134,14 @@ struct task_group;
> do { \
> WARN_ON_ONCE(is_special_task_state(state_value));\
> current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
> - current->state = (state_value); \
> + WRITE_ONCE(current->__state, (state_value)); \
> } while (0)
Why not introduce set_task_state(p) and get_task_state(p) rather than sprinkle
READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() all over the kernel ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists