[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLbqv0Sy/3E2XaVU@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 04:19:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] Introduce MDIO probe order C45 over C22
> Yeah, you're right. Thanks for pointing that out. It should be:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 1539ea021ac0..73bfde770f2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -862,11 +862,22 @@ struct phy_device *get_phy_device(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, bool is_c45)
> c45_ids.mmds_present = 0;
> memset(c45_ids.device_ids, 0xff, sizeof(c45_ids.device_ids));
>
> - if (is_c45)
> + if (is_c45) {
> r = get_phy_c45_ids(bus, addr, &c45_ids);
> - else
> + } else {
> r = get_phy_c22_id(bus, addr, &phy_id);
>
> + if (phy_id == 0) {
> + r = get_phy_c45_ids(bus, addr, &c45_ids);
> + if (r == -ENOTSUPP || r == -ENODEV)
> + return phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id,
> + false, &c45_ids);
> + else
> + return phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id,
> + true, &c45_ids);
Still not correct. Think about when get_phy_c22_id() returns an
error. Walk through all the different code paths and check they do the
right thing. It is actually a lot more complex than what is shown
here. Think about all the different types of PHYs and all the
different types of MDIO bus drivers.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists