linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: Advertise encrypted casefolding in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YLkrfL2dF+B9gR8r@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:20:28 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: Advertise encrypted casefolding in sysfs

On 06/03, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:53:26AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 06/03, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 08:40:24AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 06/03, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:50:38AM +0000, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
> > > > > > Older kernels don't support encryption with casefolding. This adds
> > > > > > the sysfs entry encrypted_casefold to show support for those combined
> > > > > > features. Support for this feature was originally added by
> > > > > > commit 7ad08a58bf67 ("f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption")
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Fixes: 7ad08a58bf67 ("f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption")
> > > > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.11+
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > > > > > index 09e3f258eb52..6604291a3cdf 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > > > > > @@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ static ssize_t features_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> > > > > >  	if (f2fs_sb_has_compression(sbi))
> > > > > >  		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
> > > > > >  				len ? ", " : "", "compression");
> > > > > > +	if (f2fs_sb_has_casefold(sbi) && f2fs_sb_has_encrypt(sbi))
> > > > > > +		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
> > > > > > +				len ? ", " : "", "encrypted_casefold");
> > > > > >  	len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
> > > > > >  				len ? ", " : "", "pin_file");
> > > > > >  	len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "\n");
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is a HUGE abuse of sysfs and should not be encouraged and added to.
> > > > 
> > > > This feature entry was originally added in 2017. Let me try to clean this up
> > > > after merging this.
> > > 
> > > Thank you.
> > > 
> > > > > Please make these "one value per file" and do not keep growing a single
> > > > > file that has to be parsed otherwise you will break userspace tools.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And I don't see a Documentation/ABI/ entry for this either :(
> > > > 
> > > > There is in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs.
> > > 
> > > So this new item was documented in the file before the kernel change was
> > > made?
> > 
> > Do we need to describe all the strings in this entry?
> > 
> > 203 What:           /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/features
> > 204 Date:           July 2017
> > 205 Contact:        "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > 206 Description:    Shows all enabled features in current device.
> 
> Of course!  Especially as this is a total violation of normal sysfs
> files, how else are you going to parse the thing?
> 
> Why wouldn't you describe the contents?

Because I was lazy. :P

Daniel, let me clean up all together in another patch. :)

> 
> But again, please obsolete this file and make the features all
> individual
> files like they should be so that you do not have any parsing problems.

Yup, will do.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h