[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210603171758.48da3357@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:17:58 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Clark Willaims <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/9] tracing/hwlat: Implement the per-cpu mode
On Fri, 14 May 2021 22:51:13 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com> wrote:
> void trace_hwlat_callback(bool enter)
> {
> - if (smp_processor_id() != nmi_cpu)
> + struct hwlat_kthread_data *kdata = get_cpu_data();
> +
> + if (kdata->kthread)
Shouldn't that be:
if (!kdata->kthread)
?
-- Steve
> return;
>
> /*
> @@ -158,13 +173,13 @@ void trace_hwlat_callback(bool enter)
> */
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK)) {
> if (enter)
> - nmi_ts_start = time_get();
> + kdata->nmi_ts_start = time_get();
> else
> - nmi_total_ts += time_get() - nmi_ts_start;
> + kdata->nmi_total_ts += time_get() - kdata->nmi_ts_start;
> }
>
> if (enter)
> - nmi_count++;
> + kdata->nmi_count++;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists