[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLlQAqlUxEt4eTiR@google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 07:56:18 +1000
From: Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [fanotify] a8b98c808e: stress-ng.fanotify.ops_per_sec 32.2%
improvement
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 03-06-21 09:57:15, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:36 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wro
> > > Greeting,
> > >
> > > FYI, we noticed a 32.2% improvement of stress-ng.fanotify.ops_per_sec due to commit:
> > >
> > >
> > > commit: a8b98c808eab3ec8f1b5a64be967b0f4af4cae43 ("fanotify: fix permission model of unprivileged group")
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I guess now we know what caused the reported regression:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210511124632.GL24154@quack2.suse.cz/
> >
> > I didn't know that capable() is so significant.
>
> Yeah, I wouldn't guess either. Interesting.
Indeed, interesting! :)
While on the topic of stress-ng, it reminds me to set this up on my server
so we can perform such regressions before merging fanotify changes into
master.
/M
Powered by blists - more mailing lists