[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cde0b1fc-eec3-2267-3872-1099840f5670@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 16:19:44 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] sh: define __BIG_ENDIAN for math-emu
On 6/3/21 12:54 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 1:17 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> The headers in include/math-emu/ test for __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
>> without checking to see if these macros are defined, so add
>> a define for __BIG_ENDIAN before pulling in these headers.
>>
>> This placates these build warnings:
>>
>> In file included from ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:23:
>> ../include/math-emu/single.h:50:21: warning: "__BIG_ENDIAN" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
>> 50 | #if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
>> In file included from ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:24:
>> ../include/math-emu/double.h:59:21: warning: "__BIG_ENDIAN" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
>> 59 | #if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
>>
>> Fixes: 4b565680d163 ("sh: math-emu support")
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- linux-next-20210528.orig/arch/sh/math-emu/sfp-util.h
>> +++ linux-next-20210528/arch/sh/math-emu/sfp-util.h
>> @@ -70,4 +70,4 @@
>>
>> #define __BYTE_ORDER __LITTLE_ENDIAN
>>
>> -
>> +#define __BIG_ENDIAN 0
>
> I don't think this is the right fix.
>
> I think the right values should be picked up from:
>
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:#define __BIG_ENDIAN 4321
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:#define __LITTLE_ENDIAN 1234
>
> How is this picked up on other architectures using <math-emu/single.h>?
Hi Geert,
There isn't very much to compare to in other arch/.
I've made a v2 patch that is done like arch/nds32/ does.
What do you think about this one?
thanks.
---
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v2] sh: define __BIG_ENDIAN for math-emu
Fix this by defining both ENDIAN macros in
<asm/sfp-machine.h> so that they can be utilized in
<math-emu/soft-fp.h> according to the latter's comment:
/* Allow sfp-machine to have its own byte order definitions. */
(This is what is done in arch/nds32/include/asm/sfp-machine.h.)
This placates these build warnings:
In file included from ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:23:
../include/math-emu/single.h:50:21: warning: "__BIG_ENDIAN" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
50 | #if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
In file included from ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:24:
../include/math-emu/double.h:59:21: warning: "__BIG_ENDIAN" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
59 | #if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
Fixes: 4b565680d163 ("sh: math-emu support")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
---
arch/sh/include/asm/sfp-machine.h | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- linux-next-20210528.orig/arch/sh/include/asm/sfp-machine.h
+++ linux-next-20210528/arch/sh/include/asm/sfp-machine.h
@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@
#ifndef _SFP_MACHINE_H
#define _SFP_MACHINE_H
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
+#define __BYTE_ORDER __BIG_ENDIAN
+#define __LITTLE_ENDIAN 0
+#else
+#define __BYTE_ORDER __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#define __BIG_ENDIAN 0
+#endif
+
#define _FP_W_TYPE_SIZE 32
#define _FP_W_TYPE unsigned long
#define _FP_WS_TYPE signed long
Powered by blists - more mailing lists