[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjdtfriARxh_CiTxFi8=T6j065HtbJGnuAas7oyPNADKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:57:15 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [fanotify] a8b98c808e: stress-ng.fanotify.ops_per_sec 32.2% improvement
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:36 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a 32.2% improvement of stress-ng.fanotify.ops_per_sec due to commit:
>
>
> commit: a8b98c808eab3ec8f1b5a64be967b0f4af4cae43 ("fanotify: fix permission model of unprivileged group")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
>
I guess now we know what caused the reported regression:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210511124632.GL24154@quack2.suse.cz/
I didn't know that capable() is so significant.
FWIW, here is a link to the test code:
https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng/blob/master/stress-fanotify.c#L474
It creates events in a loop by child process while the parent process
reads the generated events in a loop (on two different fanotify groups).
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists