linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/12] docs: accounting: update delay-accounting.rst reference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:20:53 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...onical.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Lepton Wu <ytht.net@...il.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>, Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] docs: accounting: update delay-accounting.rst
 reference

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:19:40PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:29:23 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> escreveu:

> > Afaict both vim (gf) and emacs (M-x ffap) can do this. That covers about
> > 99% of all sane editors no? :-)
> 
> Heh, not quite ;-) Here, I use nano(/pico), from the old times where 
> (al)pine was my emailer. I can live with vim, but I prefer an editor
> that starts in editing mode.

echo "startinsert" >> ~/.vimrc

> I tried to use emacs a few times, but my fingers are too much into
> pico/nano control keys, so it was ending by making me typing a lot
> slower. Besides that, nano works well on 99% of my daily needs. 
> 
> When I need more fancy, like regex substitutions, changing/moving
> big code blocks, editing multiple files at the same time, etc, 

nano can in fact do the multi-file thing, see nano -F, or add "set
multibuffer" to nanorc.

> then I just use a GUI editor (currently kate, but seeking for
> a good replacement, as some changes during F33 times - still 
> present on F34 - caused some regressions).

The fact that you need a second editor; and are looking for a
replacement disqualifies nano (and Kate for that matter) as a sane
editor IMO.

You can ofcourse start extending nano :-)