linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc/32s: Simplify calculation of segment register content

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  3 Jun 2021 08:41:40 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc/32s: Simplify calculation of segment
 register content

segment register has VSID on bits 8-31.
Bits 4-7 are reserved, there is no requirement to set them to 0.

VSIDs are calculated from VSID of SR0 by adding 0x111.

Even with highest possible VSID which would be 0xFFFFF0,
adding 16 times 0x111 results in 0x1001100.

So, the reserved bits are never overflowed, no need to clear
the reserved bits after each calculation.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h | 42 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h
index 583388399b1b..f5be185cbdf8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/mmu-hash.h
@@ -115,28 +115,32 @@ extern s32 patch__flush_hash_B;
 #include <asm/reg.h>
 #include <asm/task_size_32.h>
 
-#define UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(n) do {		\
-	if (TASK_SIZE > ((n) << 28))			\
-		mtsr(val1, (n) << 28);			\
-	if (TASK_SIZE > (((n) + 1) << 28))		\
-		mtsr(val2, ((n) + 1) << 28);		\
-	val1 = (val1 + 0x222) & 0xf0ffffff;		\
-	val2 = (val2 + 0x222) & 0xf0ffffff;		\
-} while (0)
+static __always_inline void update_user_segment(u32 n, u32 val)
+{
+	if (n << 28 < TASK_SIZE)
+		mtsr(val + n * 0x111, n << 28);
+}
 
 static __always_inline void update_user_segments(u32 val)
 {
-	int val1 = val;
-	int val2 = (val + 0x111) & 0xf0ffffff;
-
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(0);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(2);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(4);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(6);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(8);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(10);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(12);
-	UPDATE_TWO_USER_SEGMENTS(14);
+	val &= 0xf0ffffff;
+
+	update_user_segment(0, val);
+	update_user_segment(1, val);
+	update_user_segment(2, val);
+	update_user_segment(3, val);
+	update_user_segment(4, val);
+	update_user_segment(5, val);
+	update_user_segment(6, val);
+	update_user_segment(7, val);
+	update_user_segment(8, val);
+	update_user_segment(9, val);
+	update_user_segment(10, val);
+	update_user_segment(11, val);
+	update_user_segment(12, val);
+	update_user_segment(13, val);
+	update_user_segment(14, val);
+	update_user_segment(15, val);
 }
 
 #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
-- 
2.25.0