linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-zoned: allow BLKREPORTZONE without CAP_SYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:51:17 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-zoned: allow BLKREPORTZONE without CAP_SYS_ADMIN

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 01:54:53PM +0000, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>
> 
> Performing a BLKREPORTZONE operation should be allowed under the same
> permissions as read(). (read() does not require CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
> 
> Remove the CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement, and instead check that the fd was
> successfully opened with FMODE_READ. This way BLKREPORTZONE will match
> the access control requirement of read().

Does this mean that a process that does not have read nor write access
to the device itself (blocks) is capable of reading the zone
information? Eg. some monitoring tool.