[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210603110315.81146-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:03:15 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next][V2] ASoC: rsnd: check for zero node count
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Most callers of_get_child_count() check that "nr" is non-zero so it
causes a static checker warning when we don't do that here. This
does not cause a problem or a crash, but having zero SSUIes does not
make sense either so let's add a check.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unchecked return value")
Fixes: c413983eb66a ("ASoC: rsnd: adjust disabled module")
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
V2: Rephrase commit message based on Dan Carpenter's suggestion.
Thanks Dan!
---
sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
index 5682c74bb7ff..0d8f97633dd2 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
@@ -515,6 +515,9 @@ int rsnd_ssiu_probe(struct rsnd_priv *priv)
else
nr = priv->ssi_nr;
+ if (!nr)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
ssiu = devm_kcalloc(dev, nr, sizeof(*ssiu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ssiu)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists