[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210603152203.gezrjp2xiv53eqpm@steredhat>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:22:03 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/18] virtio/vsock: enable SEQPACKET for transport
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:18:57PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>To make transport work with SOCK_SEQPACKET two updates were
>added:
Present is better, and you can also mention that we enable it only if
the feature is negotiated with the device.
>1) SOCK_SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
> callback.
>2) Handling of SEQPACKET bit: guest tries to negotiate it with vhost.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
>---
> v9 -> v10:
> 1) Use 'virtio_has_feature()' to check feature bit.
> 2) Move assignment to 'seqpacket_allow' before 'rcu_assign_pointer()'.
>
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>index 2700a63ab095..bc5ee8df723a 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
> struct virtio_vsock_event event_list[8];
>
> u32 guest_cid;
>+ bool seqpacket_allow;
> };
>
> static u32 virtio_transport_get_local_cid(void)
>@@ -443,6 +444,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue
>*vq)
> queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
> }
>
>+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid);
>+
> static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> .transport = {
> .module = THIS_MODULE,
>@@ -469,6 +472,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
>
>+ .seqpacket_dequeue =
>virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
>+ .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
>+ .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow,
>+
> .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
>@@ -485,6 +492,19 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> .send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
> };
>
>+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
>+{
>+ struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
>+ bool seqpacket_allow;
>+
>+ rcu_read_lock();
>+ vsock = rcu_dereference(the_virtio_vsock);
>+ seqpacket_allow = vsock->seqpacket_allow;
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>+
>+ return seqpacket_allow;
>+}
>+
> static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
>@@ -608,6 +628,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> vsock->event_run = true;
> mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock);
>
>+ if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET))
>+ vsock->seqpacket_allow = true;
>+
> vdev->priv = vsock;
> rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock);
>
>@@ -695,6 +718,7 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> };
>
> static unsigned int features[] = {
>+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET
> };
>
> static struct virtio_driver virtio_vsock_driver = {
>--
>2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists