[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210603160904.GA983893@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:09:04 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
David.Laight@...lab.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akinobu.mita@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] libfs: fix error cast of negative value in
simple_attr_write()
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:09:16PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> The attr->set() receive a value of u64, but simple_strtoll() is used
> for doing the conversion. It will lead to the error cast if user inputs
> a negative value.
>
> Use kstrtoull() instead of simple_strtoll() to convert a string got
> from the user to an unsigned value. The former will return '-EINVAL' if
> it gets a negetive value, but the latter can't handle the situation
> correctly. Make 'val' unsigned long long as what kstrtoull() takes, this
> will eliminate the compile warning on no 64-bit architectures.
>
> Fixes: f7b88631a897 ("fs/libfs.c: fix simple_attr_write() on 32bit machines")
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
> ---
> Change since v1:
> - address the compile warning for non-64 bit platform.
> Change since v2:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1605000324-7428-1-git-send-email-yangyicong@hisilicon.com/
> - make 'val' unsigned long long and mentioned in the commit
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1605261369-551-1-git-send-email-yangyicong@hisilicon.com/
Belated error report on this. Some validation team just moved to
v5.10 and found their error injection scripts no longer work.
They have been using:
# echo $((-1 << 12)) > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/param2
to write the mask value 0xfffffffffffff000 for many years ... but
now writing a negative value (-4096) to this file gives an EINVAL error.
Maybe they've been taking advantage of a bug all this time? The
comment for debugfs_create_x64() says it is for reading/writing
an unsigned value. But when a bug fix breaks user code ... then
we are supposed to ask whether that bug is actually a feature.
If there was a debugfs_create_s64() I might just fix einj.c to
use that ... but there isn't :-(
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists