[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09a301d75899$daf244f0$90d6ced0$@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:59:43 -0500
From: "Brian Cain" <bcain@...eaurora.org>
To: "'Nathan Chancellor'" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "'Nick Desaulniers'" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
<linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] hexagon: Fix build error with CONFIG_STACKDEPOT and select CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_LD_ORPHAN_WARN
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
...
> On 5/20/2021 6:12 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi all,
...
> Brian, did you have any comments on this series? ARCH=hexagon defconfig
> is currently broken in -next, it would be a real shame if this continued
> to regress after you just got Hexagon building in mainline. These
> patches seem like they would be worthy of a 5.13 pull request.
I have started the internal review process to get these queued up in my tree. But I don't know if I would have it in time for 5.13.
> Otherwise, Andrew could pick them up with your ack and stick them in
> front of "mm/slub: use stackdepot to save stack trace in objects" so
> that there is no build regression.
Of course: I'll send my ack for the sake of keeping the build green.
-Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists