[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80df3032-3775-b2c1-f3e6-91eb459df620@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:20:47 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
mst@...hat.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] virtio: Force only split mode with protected guest
在 2021/6/4 上午1:33, Andy Lutomirski 写道:
> On 6/2/21 5:41 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Only allow split mode when in a protected guest. Followon
>> patches harden the split mode code paths, and we don't want
>> an malicious host to force anything else. Also disallow
>> indirect mode for similar reasons.
> I read this as "the virtio driver is buggy. Let's disable most of the
> buggy code in one special case in which we need a driver without bugs.
> In all the other cases (e.g. hardware virtio device connected over
> USB-C), driver bugs are still allowed."
>
> Can we just fix the driver without special cases?
I think we can, this is what this series tries to do:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg241825.html
It tries to fix without a special caring for any specific features.
Thanks
>
> --Andy
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists