lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLp35XvlTuuZrcYf@mit.edu>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:58:45 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>,
        Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: Advertise encrypted casefolding in sysfs

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:38:48PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
 > > Yes, but in the on-disk case, encrypted_casefold is redundant because it simply
> > means encrypt && casefold.  There is no encrypted_casefold flag on-disk.
> 
> I prefer to keep encrypted_casefold likewise kernel feature, which is more
> intuitive to users.

At least for ext4, there are kernel vesions which support encryption
and casefold *separetely*, but which do not support the file systems
that have encryption and casefold enabled simultaneously.  This is why
I had added /sys/fs/ext4/features/encrypted_casefold.  It was
originally not to indicate whether the on-disk file system supported
those features, but to indicate that the kernel in question supported
both features being enabled simultaneously.

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ