| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210604202613.GY4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:26:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, sboyd@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org,
kernel-team@...com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 clocksource 0/6] Do not mark clocks unstable due to
delays for v5.13
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:23:02PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:40 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 12:25:57PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> > > These options works as how they are designed. But it needs to
> > > go through a manual work and can't scale in highly automated data center
> > > fleets.
> > >
> > > .if we really don't need a watch dog at runtime, we need some data proof.
> > >
> > > Before we can disable TSC watchdog by default for all Linux instances, we
> > > still need a solution based on your patch set to train the watch dog from doing
> > > wrong things , just based on some other latency issues in system that might be
> > > unavoidable. We really can't punish tsc for the latency issues from
> > > unknown source.
> > >
> > > I agree we still need to sort out the quality problems from these latency issues
> > > noticed from watchdog rather than that we simply mute and hide as you
> > > may suspect
> > > that we may abuse the thresholds and the mechanism your patch set provides.
> > > But it should be a focus after the patch is merged in upstream.
> >
> > Works for me!
> >
> > Would you be willing to provide your Reviewed-by, Acked-by, or Tested-by
> > for the series?
>
> sure!
>
> Feel free to use Reviewed-by: luming.yu@...il.com or luming.yu@...el.com
> for requesting the patch set to be merged in mainline as it can help us to
> sort out real issues while it can improve overall user experience with tsc.
Thank you! I have applied "Reviewed-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...el.com>".
Thanx, Paul
> > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:24 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:46:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:10:37PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It appears that the patch set is not in 5.13. Will it be in 5.14?
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed it is not in v5.13. There were some late-breaking reviews and
> > > > > changes. I am currently thinking in terms of v5.14.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And more data proof seems to indciate that tsc is more stable than
> > > > > > tsc-watchdog.
> > > > >
> > > > > The tsc-watchdog being HPET? Or some other clocksource?
> > > > >
> > > > > > and we need the patch set to dis-arm wrong actions when watch dog is
> > > > > > hit by a spik.
> > > > >
> > > > > It does depend on the hardware. Thomas Gleixner provided a most
> > > > > excellent summary of the possibilities here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87a6pimt1f.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
> > > > >
> > > > > And then if your hardware's TSC is the most trustworthy clocksource
> > > > > on your system, you can always boot with tsc=reliable and avoid the
> > > > > clocksource watchdog completely, with or without this patch series.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and firmware can and apparently still sometimes does "adjust" the TSC,
> > > > and so booting with tsc=reliable can such adjustments from you.
> > > >
> > > > > Or am I missing your point?
> > > >
> > > > Thanx, Paul
> > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 12:28 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:52:58PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:11 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 07:13:40PM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:30 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If there is a sufficient delay between reading the watchdog clock and the
> > > > > > > > > > > clock under test, the clock under test will be marked unstable through no
> > > > > > > > > > > fault of its own. This series checks for this, doing limited retries
> > > > > > > > > > > to get a good set of clock reads. If the clock is marked unstable
> > > > > > > > > > > and is marked as being per-CPU, cross-CPU synchronization is checked.
> > > > > > > > > > > This series also provides delay injection, which may be enabled via
> > > > > > > > > > > kernel boot parameters to test the checking for delays.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Note that "sufficient delay" can be provided by SMIs, NMIs, and of course
> > > > > > > > > > > vCPU preemption.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 1. Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 2. Retry clock read if long delays detected.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 3. Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 4. Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 5. Limit number of CPUs checked for clock synchronization.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 6. Reduce clocksource-skew threshold for TSC.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v10, based on feedback from Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
> > > > > > > > > > > Feng Tang, Andi Kleen, Luming Yu, Xing Zhengju, and the indefatigible
> > > > > > > > > > > kernel test robot:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Automatically compute the uncertainty margin for clocksource, and
> > > > > > > > > > > also allow them to be specified manually before that clocksource
> > > > > > > > > > > is registered.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o For the automatically computed uncertainty margins, bound them
> > > > > > > > > > > below by 100 microseconds (2 * WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o For the manually specified uncertainty margins, splat (but
> > > > > > > > > > > continue) if they are less than 100 microseconds (again 2 *
> > > > > > > > > > > WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW). The purpose of splatting is to discourage
> > > > > > > > > > > production use of this clock-skew-inducing debugging technique.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Manually set the uncertainty margin for clocksource_jiffies
> > > > > > > > > > > (and thus refined_jiffies) to TICK_NSEC to compensate for the
> > > > > > > > > > > very low frequency of these clocks.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Manually set the uncertainty margin for clocksource_tsc_early
> > > > > > > > > > > to 32 milliseconds.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Apply numerous "Link:" fields to all patches.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Add some acks and CCs.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v9:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Forgive tsc_early drift, based on feedback from Feng Tang; Xing,
> > > > > > > > > > > Zhengjun; and Thomas Gleixner.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Improve CPU selection for clock-synchronization checking.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210419045155.GA596058@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v8, based on Thomas Gleixner feedback:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Reduced clock-skew threshold to 200us and delay limit to 50us.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Split out a cs_watchdog_read() function.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Removed the pointless CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU from kvm_clock.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Initialized cs_nsec_max and cs_nsec_min to avoid firsttime checks.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210414043435.GA2812539@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v7, based on Thomas Gleixner feedback:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Fix embarrassing git-format-patch operator error.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Merge pairwise clock-desynchronization checking into the checking
> > > > > > > > > > > of per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Do selective per-CPU checking rather than blindly checking all
> > > > > > > > > > > CPUs. Provide a clocksource.verify_n_cpus kernel boot parameter
> > > > > > > > > > > to control this behavior, with the value -1 choosing the old
> > > > > > > > > > > check-all-CPUs behavior. The default is to randomly check 8 CPUs.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Fix the clock-desynchronization checking to avoid a potential
> > > > > > > > > > > use-after-free error for dynamically allocated clocksource
> > > > > > > > > > > structures.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Remove redundance "wdagain_nsec < 0" from clocksource_watchdog()
> > > > > > > > > > > clocksource skew checking.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Update commit logs and do code-style updates.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210106004013.GA11179@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v5:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Rebased to v5.12-rc5.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v4:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Rebased to v5.12-rc1.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Rebased to v5.11.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Apply Randy Dunlap feedback.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v2:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Rebased to v5.11-rc6.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Updated Cc: list.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v1:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Applied feedback from Rik van Riel.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Rebased to v5.11-rc3.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > o Stripped "RFC" from the subject lines.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, Paul
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 32 +++
> > > > > > > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 1
> > > > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 21 ++
> > > > > > > > > > > b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 3
> > > > > > > > > > > b/include/linux/clocksource.h | 2
> > > > > > > > > > > b/kernel/time/clocksource.c | 23 ++
> > > > > > > > > > > b/kernel/time/jiffies.c | 15 -
> > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/clocksource.h | 3
> > > > > > > > > > > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > > > > > > 9 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > > > > > > > using the v11, I added a approve flag and made it work for my early
> > > > > > > > > > inject test where tsc is good
> > > > > > > > > > through a cross tsc sync test. Ideally with the small tweak, we could
> > > > > > > > > > get less tsc issues to debug.
> > > > > > > > > > And I'm not sure it would help in real trouble shooting cases. But we
> > > > > > > > > > will see if it would help.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you for the patch!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > However, Thomas had me rework this code to put the error injection into
> > > > > > > > > a kernel module, so this effect is now obtained in a different way.
> > > > > > > > > So I am unable to make use of your patch.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > np, thanks for the heads up.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > we will also need to measure the tsc sync retest and prove it's robust
> > > > > > > > enough to trump the bad decision from clocksource watchdog based on HPET
> > > > > > > > or other slow and old clocks while leaving good decisions pass through.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > we will re-spin the tsc story when your code is settled and landed in
> > > > > > > > the mainline.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My current series exports clocksource_verify_percpu(), which might help
> > > > > > > measuring TSC synchronization.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists