[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <454425.1622838810@turing-police>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:33:30 -0400
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: x86 - weird cross-compile build problem with try-run next-20210602
I built a gcc 11.1 cross-compiler targeting x86_64, and builds
were throwing an error message:
Makefile:149: CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support
so I added some debugging to arch/x86/Makefile:
ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32
x32_ld_ok := $(call try-run,\
/bin/echo -e '1: .quad 1b' | \
$(CC) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) -c -x assembler -o "$$TMP" - && \
$(OBJCOPY) -O elf32-x86-64 "$$TMP" "$$TMP.o" && \
$(LD) -m elf32_x86_64 "$$TMP.o" -o "$$TMP",y,n)
$(warning x32_ld_ok is +$(x32_ld_ok)+ with CC=$(CC) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) OBJ=$(OBJCOPY) LD=$(LD) )
ifeq ($(x32_ld_ok),y)
CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI := y
and that throws:
arch/x86/Makefile:143: x32_ld_ok is ++ with CC=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -fno-PIE -m64 OBJ=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-objcopy LD=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld
Anybody have a clue why $(x32_ld_ok) is null rather than 'y' or 'n'?
(It's totally possible that my cross-compiler is broken, but I still don't see how
try-run would return null rather than 'n' in that case... I built a shell script that did the
test and that ended with $? == 0, but had a warning msg:
+ /bin/echo -e '1: .quad 1b'
+ x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -fno-PIE -m64 -c -x assembler -o /tmp/z97 -
+ x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-objcopy -O elf32-x86-64 /tmp/z97 /tmp/z99.o
+ x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld -m elf32_x86_64 /tmp/z99.o -o /tmp/z98
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 0000000000401000
echo $?
+ echo 0
0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists