linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] hwmon: (scpi-hwmon) shows the negative temperature properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri,  4 Jun 2021 11:09:59 +0800
From:   Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
To:     jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>, Xin Chen <chenxin@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3] hwmon: (scpi-hwmon) shows the negative temperature properly

The scpi hwmon shows the sub-zero temperature in an unsigned integer,
which would confuse the users when the machine works in low temperature
environment. This shows the sub-zero temperature in an signed value and
users can get it properly from sensors.

Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@...inos.cn>
Tested-by: Xin Chen <chenxin@...inos.cn>

---
Changes since v1:
- Add judgment for sensor->info.class. If it is TEMPERATURE situation,
  return the sensor value as a signed value, otherwise return it as a
  unsigned value.

Changes since v2:
- Add a typecast u64 to s64 when it is a temperature value.
- Add a comment ahead of the if statement.
- Remove the unnecessary 'else' statement.
---
 drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
index 25aac40f2764..919877970ae3 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
@@ -99,6 +99,15 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 
 	scpi_scale_reading(&value, sensor);
 
+	/*
+	 * Temperature sensor values are treated as signed values based on
+	 * observation even though that is not explicitly specified, and
+	 * because an unsigned u64 temperature does not really make practical
+	 * sense especially when the temperature is below zero degrees Celsius.
+	 */
+	if (sensor->info.class == TEMPERATURE)
+		return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", (s64)value);
+
 	return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", value);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1


No virus found
		Checked by Hillstone Network AntiVirus