[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLqnU+FYSAcWwaAZ@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:21:07 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@...teo.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adam Goode <agoode@...gle.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix pixel format change for Elgato
Cam Link 4K
Hi Benjamin,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 05:19:42PM +0000, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> The Elgato Cam Link 4K HDMI video capture card reports to support three
> different pixel formats, where the first format depends on the connected
> HDMI device.
>
> ```
> $ v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 --list-formats-ext
> ioctl: VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT
> Type: Video Capture
>
> [0]: 'NV12' (Y/CbCr 4:2:0)
> Size: Discrete 3840x2160
> Interval: Discrete 0.033s (29.970 fps)
> [1]: 'NV12' (Y/CbCr 4:2:0)
> Size: Discrete 3840x2160
> Interval: Discrete 0.033s (29.970 fps)
> [2]: 'YU12' (Planar YUV 4:2:0)
> Size: Discrete 3840x2160
> Interval: Discrete 0.033s (29.970 fps)
> ```
>
> Changing the pixel format to anything besides the first pixel format
> does not work:
>
> ```
> $ v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 --try-fmt-video pixelformat=YU12
> Format Video Capture:
> Width/Height : 3840/2160
> Pixel Format : 'NV12' (Y/CbCr 4:2:0)
> Field : None
> Bytes per Line : 3840
> Size Image : 12441600
> Colorspace : sRGB
> Transfer Function : Rec. 709
> YCbCr/HSV Encoding: Rec. 709
> Quantization : Default (maps to Limited Range)
> Flags :
> ```
>
> User space applications like VLC might show an error message on the
> terminal in that case:
>
> ```
> libv4l2: error set_fmt gave us a different result than try_fmt!
> ```
>
> Depending on the error handling of the user space applications, they
> might display a distorted video, because they use the wrong pixel format
> for decoding the stream.
>
> The Elgato Cam Link 4K responds to the USB video probe
> VS_PROBE_CONTROL/VS_COMMIT_CONTROL with a malformed data structure: The
> second byte contains bFormatIndex (instead of being the second byte of
> bmHint). The first byte is always zero. The third byte is always 1.
>
> The firmware bug was reported to Elgato on 2020-12-01 and it was
> forwarded by the support team to the developers as feature request.
> There is no firmware update available since then. The latest firmware
> for Elgato Cam Link 4K as of 2021-03-23 has MCU 20.02.19 and FPGA 67.
*sigh* :-( Same vendors are depressingly unable to perform even the most
basic conformance testing.
Thanks for all this analysis and bug reports.
> Therefore add a quirk to correct the malformed data structure.
>
> The quirk was successfully tested with VLC, OBS, and Chromium using
> different pixel formats (YUYV, NV12, YU12), resolutions (3840x2160,
> 1920x1080), and frame rates (29.970 and 59.940 fps).
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@...teo.de>
> ---
>
> I am sending this patch a fourth time since I got no response and the
> last resend is over a month ago. This time I am including Linus Torvalds
> in the hope to get it reviewed.
The resend got to the top of my mailbox and I had time to review it
before it got burried again. Thanks for not giving up.
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> index 9a791d8ef200..6ce58950d78b 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> @@ -3164,6 +3164,19 @@ static const struct usb_device_id uvc_ids[] = {
> .bInterfaceSubClass = 1,
> .bInterfaceProtocol = 0,
> .driver_info = UVC_INFO_META(V4L2_META_FMT_D4XX) },
> + /*
> + * Elgato Cam Link 4K
> + * Latest firmware as of 2021-03-23 needs this quirk.
> + * MCU: 20.02.19, FPGA: 67
> + */
> + { .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE
> + | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO,
> + .idVendor = 0x0fd9,
> + .idProduct = 0x0066,
> + .bInterfaceClass = USB_CLASS_VIDEO,
> + .bInterfaceSubClass = 1,
> + .bInterfaceProtocol = 0,
> + .driver_info = UVC_INFO_QUIRK(UVC_QUIRK_FIX_FORMAT_INDEX) },
> /* Generic USB Video Class */
> { USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_VIDEO, 1, UVC_PC_PROTOCOL_UNDEFINED) },
> { USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_VIDEO, 1, UVC_PC_PROTOCOL_15) },
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> index a777b389a66e..910d22233d74 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,27 @@ static void uvc_fixup_video_ctrl(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
> struct uvc_frame *frame = NULL;
> unsigned int i;
>
> + /*
> + * The response of the Elgato Cam Link 4K is incorrect: The second byte
> + * contains bFormatIndex (instead of being the second byte of bmHint).
> + * The first byte is always zero. The third byte is always 1.
> + *
> + * The UVC 1.5 class specification defines the first five bits in the
> + * bmHint bitfield. The remaining bits are reserved and should be zero.
> + * Therefore a valid bmHint will be less than 32.
> + */
> + if (stream->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_FIX_FORMAT_INDEX && ctrl->bmHint > 255) {
Given that this is likely not going to affect other devices (at least in
the same way), I'd rather test the USB VID:PID that add a quirk.
Something along the lines of
if (usb_match_one_id(stream->dev->intf, USB_DEVICE(0x0fd9, 0x0066)) {
> + __u8 corrected_format_index;
> +
> + corrected_format_index = ctrl->bmHint >> 8;
> + uvc_dbg(stream->dev, CONTROL,
> + "Correct USB video probe response from {bmHint: 0x%04x, bFormatIndex: 0x%02x} to {bmHint: 0x%04x, bFormatIndex: 0x%02x}.\n",
> + ctrl->bmHint, ctrl->bFormatIndex,
> + ctrl->bFormatIndex, corrected_format_index);
> + ctrl->bmHint = ctrl->bFormatIndex;
According to your description above, this will always be 1. Is the third
byte always 1 because the driver always sets bmHint to 1, or would it
have a different value if we set bmHint to something else ? In the first
case I'd hardcode ctrl->bmHint to 1 here.
> + ctrl->bFormatIndex = corrected_format_index;
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < stream->nformats; ++i) {
> if (stream->format[i].index == ctrl->bFormatIndex) {
> format = &stream->format[i];
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> index cce5e38133cd..cbb4ef61a64d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@
> #define UVC_QUIRK_RESTORE_CTRLS_ON_INIT 0x00000400
> #define UVC_QUIRK_FORCE_Y8 0x00000800
> #define UVC_QUIRK_FORCE_BPP 0x00001000
> +#define UVC_QUIRK_FIX_FORMAT_INDEX 0x00002000
>
> /* Format flags */
> #define UVC_FMT_FLAG_COMPRESSED 0x00000001
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists