linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] x86/resctrl: Merge the CDP resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:56:28 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
        Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>,
        D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] x86/resctrl: Merge the CDP resources

Hi James,

On 5/19/2021 9:24 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Thanks to Reinette comments on v2. The major changes in v3 is a juggling
> of all the commit messages. One patch got merged into its parent, and
> the msr_param range thing got pulled out into its own patch. Otherwise
> changes are noted in the commit messages.

Thank you very much for reworking the commit messages. The additional 
context do make these changes easier to digest.

On a high level the goal of these patches look good to me but the 
patches themselves do have a few formatting issues and spelling mistakes 
and while bisectability is a stated goal of this work I was surprised to 
find that one patch ("x86/resctrl: Apply offset correction when config 
is staged") cannot compile.

I started to document the formatting issues but found myself duplicating 
a lot of what checkpatch.pl would already tell you. Could you please 
ensure that this series gets a clean bill of health when using 
"checkpatch.pl --strict"? I also recommend the codespell option ... 
there are a few typos in this series that checkpatch.pl was able to pick 
up. It would be more efficient to review this series from such a baseline.

Thank you

Reinette