[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210604050506.esoghbat3byaxes7@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 07:05:06 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] leds: leds-gpio-register: Supply description for
param 'id'
Hello Alex,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:33:11AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Am Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:24:36AM +0200 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > Ah, that the patch is already merged is news to me. Indeed, then fixing
> > this is not sensible. My initial feedback was less than an hour after
> > you sent the patch and it appeared just yesterday in next, so this
> > wasn't easily noticeable for me.
> >
> > Usually I'm annoyed about maintainers who don't react to patch series
> > and don't apply it. Here I'm more annoyed that I was Cc:d---which I
> > interpret as a request for feedback---and an hour later was already too
> > late for my review reply and there was (up to today) no maintainer mail
> > that the patch set was applied.
>
> Pavel applied (part of) the series quite quickly and stated in reply
> to patch 14/15:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210528093921.GA2209@amd/
Just for the record: I only got the cover letter, patch 02 and the
thread below the latter. So seeing the info there isn't straight
forward either.
> This is not really motivating to review at all. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
+1
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists