[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYsw6T_CMoV0XwLZ3YKmrKL5QsWsm4Ap4D47FrKpOCMcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:38:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Input: cy8ctmg110_ts - switch to using gpiod API
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:37 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> Instead of legacy gpio API let's use newer gpiod API. This also allows us
> to get rid of platform data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> static void cy8ctmg110_power(struct cy8ctmg110 *ts, bool poweron)
> {
> - if (ts->reset_pin)
> - gpio_direction_output(ts->reset_pin, 1 - poweron);
> + if (ts->reset_gpio)
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts->reset_gpio, !poweron);
I would perhaps drop in a comment that this de-asserts the RESET
line when we power on and asserts it when we power off.
> + ts->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, NULL,
> + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
And here that this will assert RESET.
But that is just nitpicks, the code is fine.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists