linux-kernel - Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: fixed the coding style, labels should not be indented.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19651be0dc8706da34658d25195ff122f41ee7c0.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 04 Jun 2021 01:26:30 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        'Alex Elder' <elder@...aro.org>,
        'Manikishan Ghantasala' <manikishanghantasala@...il.com>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
Cc:     Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        "greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: fixed the coding style,
 labels should not be indented.

On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 08:13 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alex Elder
> > Sent: 03 June 2021 22:55
> ...
> > Not necessarily, sizeof(bool) is implementation defined.
> > And I thought you didn't think the size of the structure
> > was very important...
> 
> It is 'implementation defined' but will be 32 bits on everything
> except an old 32bit ARM ABI.

Really? (x86-64)

$ gcc -x c -
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

struct foo {
	_Bool b;
};

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	printf("sizeof _Bool: %zu\n", sizeof(_Bool));
	printf("sizeof struct foo: %zu\n", sizeof(struct foo));
	return 0;
}
$ ./a.out
sizeof _Bool: 1
sizeof struct foo: 1