linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add Nuvoton WPCM450

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdY6c750Dnh2H_6uEhOHJv-kLd_OpHqnuDKu4DQezZ2C_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:35:48 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add Nuvoton WPCM450

Hi Jonathan!

thanks for your patch!

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 2:04 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer
<j.neuschaefer@....net> wrote:

> +  interrupts: true

maxitems 4 right?

Make an enum:

interrupts:
  - description: what IRQ0 is for
  - description: what IRQ1 is for
  - description: what IRQ2 is for
  - description: what IRQ3 is for

And describe how these interrupts are used. Because I am suspicious that they
actually correspond to 4 different GPIO blocks, which should then be their own
nodes.

> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +    pinctrl: pinctrl@...03000 {
> +      compatible = "nuvoton,wpcm450-pinctrl";
> +      reg = <0xb8003000 0x1000>;
> +      gpio-controller;
> +      #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +      interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> +                    3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> +                    4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> +                    5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

So these.

> +      rmii2 {
> +        groups = "rmii2";
> +        function = "rmii2";
> +      };
> +
> +      pinctrl_uid: uid {
> +        pins = "gpio14";
> +        input-debounce = <1>;
> +      };

I challenge you here and encourage you to put a node for each
GPIO "port":

  port0: gpio@0 {
 ....
  };
  port1: gpio@1 {
 ....
  };


> +    gpio-keys {
> +      compatible = "gpio-keys";
> +      pinctrl-names = "default";
> +      pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_uid>;
> +
> +      uid {
> +        label = "UID";
> +        linux,code = <102>;
> +        gpios = <&pinctrl 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;

Would be gpios <&port0 14...>

Yours,
Linus Walleij