linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] mfd: pm8008: Fix return value check in pm8008

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb3f9574-0869-0c49-b6fd-86c15b6858c1@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:26:01 +0800
From:   Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To:     Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mfd: pm8008: Fix return value check in
 pm8008_probe()


On 2021/6/4 3:05, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 08:31:28PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 20:18, Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:13:57PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>>> In case of error, the function devm_regmap_init_i2c() returns ERR_PTR()
>>>> and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check
>>>> should be replaced with IS_ERR().
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 6b149f3310a4 ("mfd: pm8008: Add driver for QCOM PM8008 PMIC")
>>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>>> Acked-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>
>> Interestingly, the change does not correspond to the changelog
>> message. And the code is correct as devm_kzalloc returns NULL if I
>> remember correctly.
My bad, I sent a wong patch, I will send a new one.

Thanks,
Yang
> Thanks for pointing that out - I missed that. I would like to retract my
> Acked-by for this patch.
>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c | 2 +-
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
>>>> index c472d7f8103c..dfefa60d693b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
>>>> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int pm8008_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>>        struct pm8008_data *chip;
>>>>
>>>>        chip = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> -     if (!chip)
>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(chip))
>>>>                return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>>        chip->dev = &client->dev;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> With best wishes
>> Dmitry
> .