| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <KL1P15301MB034321F9FA32CA3A5BBE7AE9943B9@KL1P15301MB0343.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:12:33 +0000
From: Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@...rosoft.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
"linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and
chan_index to "unsigned long"
Hi Geert,
You can find the updated patches in the linux-cifs mailing list about an hour ago.
Titled: Multichannel patches
-----Original Message-----
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 4:39 PM
To: Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>; linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org; linux-next@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"
Hi Shyam,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:41 PM Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the email.
> I've already submitted the fix for this. You should see this fixed tomorrow.
Where can I find these submitted fixes?
As per linux-next policy[1], commits in linux-next should be posted to the relevant mailing list first, which is linux-cifs, AFAIK.
Thanks!
[1] https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flinux-next%2F20210430174733.5a31d0c6%40canb.auug.org.au%2F&data=04%7C01%7CShyam.Prasad%40microsoft.com%7C50e24fa9469045cee62208d9274937e2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637584017711363338%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=WVfbz5WhzyupDUljqSmxlyCdSZtOPcdGxwYpoyqYXqA%3D&reserved=0
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 2:32 PM
> To: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>; Shyam Prasad
> <Shyam.Prasad@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org; linux-next@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"
>
> On 32-bit (e.g. m68k):
>
> fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In function 'cifs_reconnect_tcon':
> ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
> fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:201:42: note: format string is defined here
> 201 | cifs_dbg(FYI, "sess reconnect mask: 0x%lx, tcon reconnect: %d",
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long unsigned int
> | %x
>
> fs/cifs/transport.c: In function 'cifs_pick_channel':
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h:955:20: error: passing argument 2 of 'test_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 955 | test_bit((index), &(ses)->chans_need_reconnect)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:151:66: note: expected 'const volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
> 151 | static inline int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
> fs/cifs/sess.c: In function 'cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect':
> fs/cifs/sess.c:98:22: error: passing argument 2 of 'bset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 98 | set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:41:69: note: expected 'volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
> 41 | static inline void bset_mem_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> fs/cifs/sess.c:98:22: error: passing argument 2 of 'bfset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 98 | set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
> ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:50:70: note: expected 'volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
> 50 | static inline void bfset_mem_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
> [...]
>
> As bitops can only operate on long objects, and
> cifs_ses_get_chan_index() already returns "unsigned long", fix this by changing cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index from "size_t" to "unsigned long".
>
> Fixes: 374c6c7bba3cbaa1 ("cifs: changes to support multichannel during
> channel reconnect")
> Reported-by: noreply@...erman.id.au
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> ---
> Can you please add Link: headers when committing patches?
> I could not find this patch in the lore archives of linux-cifs or linux-fsdevel, presumably it was posted elsewhere?
> Thanks!
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 2 +-
> fs/cifs/sess.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h index
> 8fea2ddd2bd7af26..a9c026af21e1e9d1 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ struct cifs_ses {
> * enable the sessions on top to continue to live till any
> * of the channels below are active.
> */
> - size_t chans_need_reconnect;
> + unsigned long chans_need_reconnect;
> };
>
> static inline bool
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/sess.c b/fs/cifs/sess.c index
> 1721a3b246942266..1a17ddd6abbe5778 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/sess.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/sess.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void
> cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
> struct TCP_Server_Info *server) {
> - size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> + unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses,
> + server);
> set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "Set reconnect bitmask for chan %lu; now 0x%lx\n",
> chan_index, ses->chans_need_reconnect); @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void cifs_chan_clear_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
> struct TCP_Server_Info *server) {
> - size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> + unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses,
> + server);
> clear_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "Cleared reconnect bitmask for chan %lu; now 0x%lx\n",
> chan_index, ses->chans_need_reconnect); @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ bool cifs_chan_needs_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
> struct TCP_Server_Info *server) {
> - size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> + unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses,
> + server);
> return CIFS_CHAN_NEEDS_RECONNECT(ses, chan_index); }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists