[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aba00834-2e1c-f8cf-e2ab-f13303eac562@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:58:24 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait
On 6/4/21 10:19 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 11:31, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 6/1/21 10:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> 1) The proposed solution: I can't figure out from the changelogs or the
>>> cover letter what kind of problems it solves and what the exact
>>> semantics are. If you ever consider to submit futex patches, may I
>>> recommend to study Documentation/process and get some inspiration
>>> from git-log?
>>
>> I'm sorry you're incapable of grasping ideas quick, but may we
>> stop this stupid galling and switch to a more productive way of
>> speaking?
>
> which you just achieved by telling me I'm too stupid to understand your
> brilliant idea. Great start for a productive discussion. Try again.
Exactly why there was "we". I have my share of annoyance, which I would
readily put aside if that saves me time. And that's the suggestion
made
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists