[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ed358ce-de98-0b42-2446-873af55ed825@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:51:34 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] memory: tegra: Changes for v5.14-rc1
04.06.2021 12:32, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:56:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 03.06.2021 17:37, Thierry Reding пишет:
>>> memory: tegra: Changes for v5.14-rc1
>>>
>>> This stable tag contains Dmitry's power domain work, including all the
>>> necessary dependencies from the regulator, clock and ARM SoC trees.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dmitry Osipenko (18):
>>> clk: tegra30: Use 300MHz for video decoder by default
>>> clk: tegra: Fix refcounting of gate clocks
>>> clk: tegra: Ensure that PLLU configuration is applied properly
>>> clk: tegra: Halve SCLK rate on Tegra20
>>> clk: tegra: Don't allow zero clock rate for PLLs
>>> clk: tegra: cclk: Handle thermal DIV2 CPU frequency throttling
>>> clk: tegra: Mark external clocks as not having reset control
>>> clk: tegra: Don't deassert reset on enabling clocks
>>> regulator: core: Add regulator_sync_voltage_rdev()
>>
>>> soc/tegra: regulators: Bump voltages on system reboot
>>
>> This patch is a build dependency prerequisite for the "soc/tegra:
>> regulators: Support core domain state syncing" patch. Will you send a
>> new PR to Krzysztof with the remaining soc/tegra patches?
>
> soc/tegra patches usually go in through ARM SoC. This is merely included
> here because it was part of the set of patches that were needed to
> enable compile testing for the memory controller drivers.
>
> I've applied the remaining soc/tegra patches (12-14 of the series) to my
> for-5.14/soc branch but ended up not pulling that part in because it was
> unnecessary for the memory controller patches.
Does this mean that if for-5.14/soc will be pulled first into mainline,
then the patches will be applied in a wrong order?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists