[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8c838a2213184b4f8c2f482f9a9ab08@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 09:49:28 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests
send/compl paths
Hi Stanley,
On 2021-06-03 10:54, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Hi Can,
>
> On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 01:36 -0700, Can Guo wrote:
>> Current UFS IRQ handler is completely wrapped by host lock, and
>> because
>> ufshcd_send_command() is also protected by host lock, when IRQ handler
>> fires, not only the CPU running the IRQ handler cannot send new
>> requests,
>> the rest CPUs can neither. Move the host lock wrapping the IRQ handler
>> into
>> specific branches, i.e., ufshcd_uic_cmd_compl(),
>> ufshcd_check_errors(),
>> ufshcd_tmc_handler() and ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(). Meanwhile, to
>> further
>> reduce occpuation of host lock in ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(), host
>> lock is
>> no longer required to call __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(). As per test,
>> the
>> optimization can bring considerable gain to random read/write
>> performance.
>>
>> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
>
> According to my test, the performance indeed has impressive improvement
> with this series!
>
Thanks a lot for your time and review. :)
Regards,
Can Guo.
> Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
>
>
>
>
>> #endif
>>
>> bool req_abort_skip;
>> - bool in_use;
>> };
>>
>> /**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists