[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210604021422.GA25112@aspeedtech.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:14:23 +0800
From: Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hongweiz@....com" <Hongweiz@....com>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support
The 06/03/2021 19:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 1:19 PM Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > AST2600 SoC has 2 SGPIO master interfaces one with 128 pins another one
> > with 80 pins.
> > In the current driver, the maximum number of gpio pins of SoC is hardcoded
> > as 80 and the gpio pin count mask for GPIO Configuration register is
> > hardcode as GENMASK(9,6). In addition, some functions uses the hardcoded
>
> use
>
> > value to calculate the gpio offset.
> > The patch adds ast2600 compatibles and platform data that includes the
> > max number of gpio pins supported by ast2600 and gpio pin count mask for
> > GPIO Configuration register.
> > The patch also modifies some functions to pass aspeed_sgpio struct for
> > calculating gpio offset wihtout using the hardcoded value.
>
> without
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>
> Why?
>
> ...
>
I will remove it as of_device_get_match_data() will be replaced
to device_get_match_data()
> > +#define GPIO_OFFSET(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>
> GENMASK()
>
> ...
>
Do you mean the macro should be modified as follows?
#define GPIO_OFFSET(x) ((x) & GENMASK(4, 0))
> > + pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> device_get_match_data()
>
> I guess you may replace all those of_*() to the corresponding
> device_*() or fwnode_*() calls.
>
Thanks for the reviews, I will add a new patch for replacing all
of_*() to device_*().
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists