[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6AydanksvciHuxRPoOddFX3ov0Pp511RkzO8nLn3TJUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:45:28 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: periodically flush the memcg stats
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:33 PM Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 09:54:21AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > The cond_resched() in cgroup_rstat_flush_locked() matches its appearence in
> > your post [1]. So does unbound IMHO.
>
> Ah yeah, this either needs CPU_INTENSIVE or UNBOUND, prolly the latter is
> better.
>
I will change the next version to the system_unbound_wq.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists