lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <65a78bd39b0d317de9623976449e273e92a1e1c0.1622898327.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat,  5 Jun 2021 15:18:33 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 34/34] docs: x86: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup

The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py.
So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 4 ++--
 Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
index fc844913dece..894a19897005 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ follow::
 In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct
 boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should
 also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as
-described in chapter :doc:`zero-page`.
+described in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
 
 After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load the
 32/64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol.
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ can be calculated as follows::
 In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct
 boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should
 also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as described
-in chapter :doc:`zero-page`.
+in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
 
 After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load
 64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol, but
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
index c5b695d75349..9f0b1851771a 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ are aligned with platform MTRR setup. If MTRRs are only set up by the platform
 firmware code though and the OS does not make any specific MTRR mapping
 requests mtrr_type_lookup() should always return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID.
 
-For details refer to :doc:`pat`.
+For details refer to Documentation/x86/pat.rst.
 
 .. tip::
   On Intel P6 family processors (Pentium Pro, Pentium II and later)
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ