linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: modpost: Explicitly warn about unprototyped symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAR6bXXk9-ZzZYpTqzFqdYbQsZHmiWspu27rtsFxvfRuVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 5 Jun 2021 23:19:44 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: modpost: Explicitly warn about unprototyped symbols

On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 12:36 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> One common cause of modpost version generation failures is is a failure to

double "is"

> prototype exported assembly functions - the tooling requires this for
> exported functions even if they are not and should not be called from C
> code in order to do the version mangling for symbols. Unfortunately the
> error message is currently rather abstruse, simply saying that "version
> generation failed" and even diving into the code doesn't directly show
> what's going on since there's several steps between the problem and it
> being observed.
>
> Provide an explicit hint as to the likely cause of a version generation
> failure to help anyone who runs into this in future more readily diagnose
> and fix the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
>  scripts/mod/modpost.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> index 3e623ccc020b..78553f95c250 100644
> --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> @@ -662,6 +662,8 @@ static void handle_modversion(const struct module *mod,
>         if (sym->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF) {
>                 warn("EXPORT symbol \"%s\" [%s%s] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned.\n",
>                      symname, mod->name, mod->is_vmlinux ? "" : ".ko");
> +               warn("Is \"%s\" prototyped in asm/asm-prototypes.h?\n",
> +                    symname);

May I ask for small changes?


Could you enclose the header with angle bralets, like this
<asm/asm-protytypes.h>  ?


These two sentences are related, so could you merge them
into a single warn() call, like this ?

warn("EXPORT symbol \"%s\" [%s%s] version ...\n",
         "Is \"%s\" prototyped in <asm/asm-prototypes.h>?\n",
          symname, mod->name, mod->is_vmlinux ? "" : ".ko", modname);



>                 return;
>         }

>
> --
> 2.20.1
>


--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada