lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Jun 2021 22:30:39 +0200
From:   Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
To:     Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     heiko@...ech.de, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...il.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] dt-bindings: spi: spi-rockchip: add description
 for rv1126

Hi Jon,

Some comments. Have a look if it's useful.

===

In order to get this patch reviewed by rob+dt you must include:
robh+dt@...nel.org
devicetree@...r.kernel.org

Check your review status here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/list/

Get the other lists and maintainers with:
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --noroles --norolestats --nogit-fallback
--nogit <patch1> <patch2>

===

Please try to order patches like:
(1) dt-binding - compatible addition
(2) driver patches
(3) devicetree node patches

The script below gives a warning if the wrong order is used.
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict <patch1> <patch2>

===

The [PATCH v3 2/8] has duplicate Signed-off-by's.

Signed-off-by: Jon Lin <jon.lin at rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Lin <jon.lin at rock-chips.com>

What has changed in version 3 ?
Maybe add a cover letter and a change log too?
git format-patch -v4 -8 --cover-letter HEAD
===

The commit message in [PATCH v3 4/8] has to many "applications", so
maybe restyle a bit?

Add compatible string for rv1126 to applications for potential
applications.

Adding "rockchip,rv1126-spi" to rockchip_spi_dt_match[] is strictly not
needed when using "rockchip,rk3066-spi" as fall back string.
Could a maintainer advice?

Maybe this bug of mine should revert too?? Or is it legacy? ;)
spi: rockchip: add compatible string for px30 rk3308 rk3328
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200309151004.7780-1-jbx6244@gmail.com

===

Johan

On 6/5/21 11:46 AM, Jon Lin wrote:
> The description below will be used for rv1126.dtsi in the future
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.yaml
> index 1e6cf29e6388..4ed5b72a8494 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.yaml
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
>        - items:
>            - enum:
>                - rockchip,px30-spi

> +              - rockchip,rv1126-spi

Sort alphabetically.

>                - rockchip,rk3188-spi
>                - rockchip,rk3288-spi
>                - rockchip,rk3308-spi
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ