lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a50cb60-f184-0d6e-723b-5bad4b5fd14a@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:49:39 +0800
From:   Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: kernel/trace/trace.c:3634:2: warning: function
 might be possible candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute



On 6/5/21 4:48 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 19:12:03 +0800
> kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> head:   f88cd3fb9df228e5ce4e13ec3dbad671ddb2146e
>> commit: 9a6944fee68e25084130386c608c5ac8db487581 tracing: Add a verifier to check string pointers for trace events
>> date:   3 months ago
>> config: x86_64-rhel (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-6 (Ubuntu 6.4.0-17ubuntu1) 6.4.0 20180424
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>          # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9a6944fee68e25084130386c608c5ac8db487581
>>          git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>          git fetch --no-tags linus master
>>          git checkout 9a6944fee68e25084130386c608c5ac8db487581
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          make W=1 ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'test_can_verify_check':
>>>> kernel/trace/trace.c:3634:2: warning: function might be possible candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
>>       vsnprintf(buf, 16, "%d", ap);
>>       ^~~~~~~~~
> "test_can_verify_check" is not a generic function that needs a printf
> format check. This is a bogus warning. Please remove it as being an issue.
>
> -- Steve
>

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the feedback, we'll ignore the commit to avoid new reports 
for this warning.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

>
>>     kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'trace_check_vprintf':
>>     kernel/trace/trace.c:3717:3: warning: function might be possible candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
>>        trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, iter->fmt, ap);
>>        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>     kernel/trace/trace.c:3756:3: warning: function might be possible candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
>>        trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, p, ap);
>>        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
>> vim +/gnu_printf +3634 kernel/trace/trace.c
>>
>>    3617	
>>    3618	static int test_can_verify_check(const char *fmt, ...)
>>    3619	{
>>    3620		char buf[16];
>>    3621		va_list ap;
>>    3622		int ret;
>>    3623	
>>    3624		/*
>>    3625		 * The verifier is dependent on vsnprintf() modifies the va_list
>>    3626		 * passed to it, where it is sent as a reference. Some architectures
>>    3627		 * (like x86_32) passes it by value, which means that vsnprintf()
>>    3628		 * does not modify the va_list passed to it, and the verifier
>>    3629		 * would then need to be able to understand all the values that
>>    3630		 * vsnprintf can use. If it is passed by value, then the verifier
>>    3631		 * is disabled.
>>    3632		 */
>>    3633		va_start(ap, fmt);
>>> 3634		vsnprintf(buf, 16, "%d", ap);
>>    3635		ret = va_arg(ap, int);
>>    3636		va_end(ap);
>>    3637	
>>    3638		return ret;
>>    3639	}
>>    3640	
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ