[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210607060827.vxdihsfqtw3otyco@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:08:27 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM
state
Hello Thierry,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:49:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> In the interest of making forward progress, I've applied this series.
I proposed a different approach that in contrast to usage_power:
- is well defined
(so driver authors and consumers know what to provide or expect resp.);
- has good name people understand without reading documentation;
- fully covers the problem Clemens want to address;
- fully covers what the only implementing lowlevel driver does; and
- is easy to implement based on the patches in this series
This is not what I call "forward progress". I take it personal that
after I pointed out technical shortcomings with this patch set and even
suggested a better concept, you didn't even made the effort to argue
but instead simply went on applying the patches.
Can you please point out what I'm missing?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists