[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210607100234.v9.10.I24bba069e63b1eea84443eef0c8535fd032a6311@changeid>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:05:54 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Linus W <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, robdclark@...omium.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 10/11] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Improve probe errors with dev_err_probe()
As I was testing to make sure that the DEFER path worked well with my
patch series, I got tired of seeing this scary message in my logs just
because the panel needed to defer:
[drm:ti_sn_bridge_probe] *ERROR* could not find any panel node
Let's use dev_err_probe() which nicely quiets this error and also
simplifies the code a tiny bit. We'll also update other places in the
file which can use dev_err_probe().
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
Changes in v9:
- ("Improve probe errors") patch new for v9.
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 31 +++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index b544cbce7fdd..5d712c8c3c3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -1305,10 +1305,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
int ret;
ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 1, 0, &pdata->panel, NULL);
- if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("could not find any panel node\n");
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(&adev->dev, ret,
+ "could not find any panel node\n");
ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(pdata, np);
@@ -1456,27 +1455,23 @@ static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
pdata->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client,
&ti_sn65dsi86_regmap_config);
- if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap)) {
- DRM_ERROR("regmap i2c init failed\n");
- return PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap);
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap),
+ "regmap i2c init failed\n");
pdata->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
- if (IS_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio)) {
- DRM_ERROR("failed to get enable gpio from DT\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio),
+ "failed to get enable gpio from DT\n");
ret = ti_sn65dsi86_parse_regulators(pdata);
- if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("failed to parse regulators\n");
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse regulators\n");
pdata->refclk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "refclk");
if (IS_ERR(pdata->refclk))
- return PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk);
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk),
+ "failed to get reference clock\n");
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_sn65dsi86_runtime_disable, dev);
--
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists