linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] regmap-irq: Introduce inverted status registers support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  7 Jun 2021 20:00:43 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rafael@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] regmap-irq: Introduce inverted status registers support

On Tue, 25 May 2021 06:42:03 +0300, Maxim Kochetkov wrote:
> Some interrupt controllers have inverted status register:
> cleared bits is active interrupts and set bits is inactive interrupts,
> so add inverted status support to the framework.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap-irq: Introduce inverted status registers support
      commit: bcd23f93d3984a94d64ce0b6bbfa3789c0e8ebaf

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark