linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/oom_kill: allow oom kill allocating task for non-global case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:26:00 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        llong@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/oom_kill: allow oom kill allocating task for
 non-global case

On 6/7/21 3:01 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 07-06-21 17:31:03, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
>> At the present time, in the context of memcg OOM, even when
>> sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled/or set, the "allocating"
>> task cannot be selected, as a target for the OOM killer.
>>
>> This patch removes the restriction entirely.
> This is a global oom policy not a memcg specific one so a historical
> behavior would change. So I do not think we can change that. The policy
> can be implemented on the memcg level but this would require a much more
> detailed explanation of the usecase and the semantic (e.g. wrt.
> hierarchical behavior etc).

Maybe we can extend the meaning of oom_kill_allocating_task such that 
memcg OOM killing of allocating task is only enabled when bit 1 is set. 
So if an existing application just set oom_kill_allocating_task to 1, it 
will not be impacted.

Cheers,
Longman