lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  7 Jun 2021 21:54:28 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@...hat.com>,
        Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>,
        Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 10/12] virtio-mem: use a single dynamic memory group for a single virtio-mem device

Let's use a single dynamic memory group.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
index e327fb878143..6b9b8b7bf89d 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ struct virtio_mem {
 	 * add_memory_driver_managed().
 	 */
 	const char *resource_name;
+	/* Memory group identification. */
+	int mgid;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't want to add too much memory if it's not getting onlined,
@@ -622,8 +624,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_add_memory(struct virtio_mem *vm, uint64_t addr,
 		addr + size - 1);
 	/* Memory might get onlined immediately. */
 	atomic64_add(size, &vm->offline_size);
-	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(vm->nid, addr, size, vm->resource_name,
-				       MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE);
+	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(vm->mgid, addr, size, vm->resource_name,
+				       MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE | MHP_NID_IS_MGID);
 	if (rc) {
 		atomic64_sub(size, &vm->offline_size);
 		dev_warn(&vm->vdev->dev, "adding memory failed: %d\n", rc);
@@ -2550,6 +2552,7 @@ static bool virtio_mem_has_memory_added(struct virtio_mem *vm)
 static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct virtio_mem *vm;
+	uint64_t unit_pages;
 	int rc;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct virtio_mem_req) != 24);
@@ -2584,6 +2587,16 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_del_vq;
 
+	/* use a single dynamic memory group to cover the whole memory device */
+	if (vm->in_sbm)
+		unit_pages = PHYS_PFN(memory_block_size_bytes());
+	else
+		unit_pages = PHYS_PFN(vm->bbm.bb_size);
+	rc = register_dynamic_memory_group(vm->nid, unit_pages);
+	if (rc < 0)
+		goto out_del_resource;
+	vm->mgid = rc;
+
 	/*
 	 * If we still have memory plugged, we have to unplug all memory first.
 	 * Registering our parent resource makes sure that this memory isn't
@@ -2598,7 +2611,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	vm->memory_notifier.notifier_call = virtio_mem_memory_notifier_cb;
 	rc = register_memory_notifier(&vm->memory_notifier);
 	if (rc)
-		goto out_del_resource;
+		goto out_unreg_group;
 	rc = register_virtio_mem_device(vm);
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_unreg_mem;
@@ -2612,6 +2625,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	return 0;
 out_unreg_mem:
 	unregister_memory_notifier(&vm->memory_notifier);
+out_unreg_group:
+	unregister_memory_group(vm->mgid);
 out_del_resource:
 	virtio_mem_delete_resource(vm);
 out_del_vq:
@@ -2676,6 +2691,7 @@ static void virtio_mem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	} else {
 		virtio_mem_delete_resource(vm);
 		kfree_const(vm->resource_name);
+		unregister_memory_group(vm->mgid);
 	}
 
 	/* remove all tracking data - no locking needed */
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ