[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210607202454.7rhc7ufiphgrhqqx@rejoice>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:24:54 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
CC: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: am65: align ti,pindir-d0-out-d1-in
property with dt-shema
On 19:18-20210607, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> Hi Nishanth,
>
> On 07/06/21 7:10 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 18:04-20210602, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> >> ti,pindir-d0-out-d1-in property is expected to be of type boolean.
> >> Therefore, fix the property accordingly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
> > No need for Fixes?
> >
>
> Functionality wise this is not a bug as the driver only checks for the
> presence of the property. This is the reason why I did not include fixes.
>
Argument was based on device tree is considered independent of what or
what not a driver does.
> > Also please split up the patches per maintainer so that we are'nt
> > confused on who should pick what etc..
> >
>
> okay. Will be aware of this from next time.
>
Actually, I have dropped this off my list. I am assuming you'd want the
bindings to be merged after the dts cleanup is done.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists