[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YL29gP0j1qmVuzyy@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 07:32:32 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Changheun Lee <nanich.lee@...sung.com>
Cc: Johannes.Thumshirn@....com, alex_y_xu@...oo.ca,
asml.silence@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, bgoncalv@...hat.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
cang@...eaurora.org, avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
bvanassche@....org, damien.lemoal@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hch@...radead.org, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ming.lei@...hat.com, osandov@...com,
patchwork-bot@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, tom.leiming@...il.com,
yi.zhang@...hat.com, jisoo2146.oh@...sung.com,
junho89.kim@...sung.com, mj0123.lee@...sung.com,
seunghwan.hyun@...sung.com, sookwan7.kim@...sung.com,
woosung2.lee@...sung.com, yt0928.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/3] bio: control bio max size
NAK. As discussed countless time we already have an actual limit.
And we can look it as advisory before building ever bigger bios,
but the last thing we need is yet another confusing limit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists