[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x==tXk2Lt_f14_azHNYG2mZzMb9-1b2YUVj=+i=-JLemdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:55:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Kyle Meyer <kyle.meyer@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: Skip initialization if a cpufreq driver exists
Hi Rafael,
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 7:47 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:19 AM Kyle Meyer <kyle.meyer@....com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > index 7e7450453714..e79a945369d1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ static int __init acpi_cpufreq_init(void)
> >
> > /* don't keep reloading if cpufreq_driver exists */
> > if (cpufreq_get_current_driver())
> > - return -EEXIST;
> > + return 0;
> >
> > pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
> >
> > --
>
> Applied as 5.14 material with some edits in the subject and changelog, thanks!
I am not sure how this is supposed to work. If we return 0 from
acpi_cpufreq_init(),
then the driver will never be used, since it's acpi_cpufreq_init()
will never get
called again later.
cpufreq drivers don't follow the generic device/driver model where a driver gets
probed again if a device appears and so this is broken.
Please revert this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists