[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210607084015.1620-1-sjpark@amazon.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:40:15 +0000
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To: sj38.park@...il.com
Cc: jgowans@...zon.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
amit@...nel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, corbet@....net, david@...hat.com,
dwmw@...zon.com, elver@...gle.com, fan.du@...el.com,
foersleo@...zon.de, greg@...ah.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
guoju.fgj@...baba-inc.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
riel@...riel.com, rientjes@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
rppt@...nel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org,
snu@...le79.org, vbabka@...e.cz, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
zgf574564920@...il.com, linux-damon@...zon.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/13] mm/damon/schemes: Activate schemes based on a watermarks mechanism
From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
On Mon, 31 May 2021 13:38:13 +0000 sj38.park@...il.com wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
>
> DAMON-based operation schemes need to be manually turned on and off. In
> some use cases, however, the condition for turning a scheme on and off
> would depend on the system's situation. For example, schemes for
> proactive pages reclamation would need to be turned on when some memory
> pressure is detected, and turned off when the system has enough free
> memory.
>
> For easier control of schemes activation based on the system situation,
> this commit introduces a watermarks-based mechanism. The client can
> describe the watermark metric (e.g., amount of free memory in the
> system), watermark check interval, and three watermarks, namely high,
> mid, and low. If the scheme is deactivated, it only gets the metric and
> compare that to the three watermarks for every check interval. If the
> metric is higher than the high watermark, the scheme is deactivated. If
> the metric is between the mid watermark and the low watermark, the
> scheme is activated. If the metric is lower than the low watermark, the
> scheme is deactivated again. This is to allow users fall back to
> traditional page-granularity mechanisms.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> ---
> include/linux/damon.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/damon/core.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 5 ++-
> 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index 565f49d8ba44..2edd84e98056 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,45 @@ struct damos_speed_limit {
> unsigned int min_score;
> };
[...]
> static void set_kdamond_stop(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> {
> mutex_lock(&ctx->kdamond_lock);
> @@ -904,6 +982,13 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
> sz_limit = damon_region_sz_limit(ctx);
>
> while (!kdamond_need_stop(ctx)) {
> + unsigned long wmark_wait_us = kdamond_wmark_wait_us(ctx);
> +
> + if (wmark_wait_us) {
> + usleep_range(wmark_wait_us, wmark_wait_us + 1);
> + continue;
> + }
James Gowans (jgowans@...zon.com) found this will make kdamond sleeps in
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state. So, when DAMON is deactivated due to the
watermarks rule, the sysadmin assumes it would do nothing and DAMON really do
nothing. But, because it's sleeping in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state, which is
usually interpreted as waiting for I/O, '/proc/loadavg' like monitors will
report I/O loads, so that the sysadmin get confused.
In the next version of this RFC patchset, I will make this to use
'schedule_timeout_interruptible()' instead, if 'wmark_wait_us' is larger than
100ms. I will continue using 'usleep_range()' for small sleep time, to keep
the precision high.
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists